I’m back.
I’ve been to Sydney for work. Fun. Regrettably, no time to sightsee.
Maybe next time.
And so we have it. Another fearsomly disappointing Rugby World Cup. Our earliest ever exit.
We had the best squad in years. We had ample preparation time. We had massive resources. We just failed to turn up and play. France fielded a team that played intelligently to the ABs weaknesses, and then out gutsed them when it counted.
To be fair, I still think most of the blame falls on appalling decision making by the referee. McAlister should never have been sinbinned. It was barely even an infringement, and there was certainly no malice.
Worse still was the missed forward pass that allowed the second French try. How none of the match officials saw it I will never understand. Even the crowd heard it – you could hear them respond.
The French repeatedly infringed around the ruck, slowing the play of the ball and denying the ABs the free flowing play that is their strength. Again, this is an area constantly highlighted in rugby as lacking in consistent refereeing.
The IRB needs to make sure novice referees are never again allowed to officiate such important quarter finals.
All that said, the French played well, and passionately. Scenarios like this one do occur in finals rugby, and the ABs had enough depth, skill and class that they ought to have been able to clinch it regardless.
They just lacked the mental fortitude to grind out a win when things weren’t going their way. This has been a characteristic of AB sides in recent years, to my mind, but I feel it is not often exposed. They can often come out, stamp their mark on the game, and control it from there to the end. However, on the occasions where a side has cracked their armour, they seem to struggle to find a response.
I put it down to a lack of practice at having to fight tooth and nail for a victory that they must win. It’s something only seen in finals rugby, which means either World Cup or Super 14. I disagreed at the decision to not allow ABs to play in Super 14 teams this season, but gave the benefit of the doubt to the selectors. The rotation policy succeeded in producing a fit team, with depth in key positions. I supported that policy, but there came a time when they ought to have consolidated as a team by picking the top side and playing them in. Lacking a decent test in their round robin games, I believe this was their key failing.
Now they must face the inevitable storm of media looking for answers. In past cups, they could at least say they fought with honour and lost to a better side on the night. There is no such honour this time.
The public will not forgive easily on this one.
I may have blogged this subject before, but I’m reiterating my opposition to changing the New Zealand flag. The debate has been kicking about for a while, but yesterday marked the 100 year anniverary of New Zealand’s transition from Colony to Dominion so it’s back in the media.
Prime Minister Helen Clark has been quoted in the Herald:
Helen Clark said if the public did want to “New Zealandise our flag” the Union Jack could be taken out, leaving it with the “rather attractive Southern Cross”.
I ask: How can you New Zealandise the New Zealand Flag. It is New Zealand. By definition that is what it says, is, and represents.
I sometimes wonder about people who say they are proud to be a kiwi, but hate the flag and want a new one. I’m not calling them unpatriotic, I just wonder how they can look upon a symbol that represents New Zealand and not feel proud of it.
New Zealand is not a product of its flag. Kiwis built this nation with their blood, sweat and tears, not by picking a nice emblem that said we were a British Colony and we’re in the Southern Ocean. To me, the New Zealand flag is a visual summary of New Zealand. And therefore, because I like New Zealand I like it’s flag.
People arguing for the change are saying things like ‘we should have a flag that represents our unique character, and emphasises our maori and pacific island heritage.’ I have no objection to that in principal, but my question is: why do we not feel that that is already the case? As I said already, the flag, to me, represents all that already.
I think the key point is ownership. Take the Aussies. They have fantastic national pride and character, especially abroad. They love their flag, and you can see that at any international sporting event. Their flag is very similar to ours. They have an even more diverse cultural spread. I think the difference is that they went out and said ‘I’m from a fantastic country, and this is the flag that I carry.’ It’s all about attitude, and they just went out and owned it.
I believe in working with what you have. I would very much like to see all those people stop whinging that our flag doesn’t represent us sufficiently and go out and make it represent us, rather than the reverse.
Ain’t broke. Don’t fix it. Let’s not wag the dog any more.
I have discovered every blogger’s wet dream: http://www.netdisaster.com
This nifty wee site allows you to enter any URL and pick a means of destruction, and lo – it destroys that page before your very eyes! Some are even interactive, with intuitive point and click action.
Want to drop nukes on Aerchie? No problem.
Want to attack Metro with a chainsaw? Don’t we all.
Want The Lord Above to smite Raincoaster? Not as much as she seems to, with her continuous worshipping of other deities and Old Beings, Aerchie or otherwise.
There’s lots of other neat ones, including Mars Attacks, Scribbling Baby, Cow Dung, Wasps etc.
I hereby coin a new meme: Destructomeme! Destroy three bloggers with this neat tool. Go nuts.
Robert Jordan, author of The Wheel of Time, has passed away of a rare blood disorder.
Everyone I have ever met that has read fantasy has read at least one of the Wheel of Time series. Few have read less than all of them. A great number of them have expressed frustration that they don’t actually like the books all that much, but the story has hooked them years ago, and now they need closure. That’s the mark of an excellent storyteller.
It seems especially cruel that Mr Jordan should die before managing to complete the 12th and final book of the series. Truly the work of a lifetime, and of epic proportions.
I think it is likely that the 12th book will still make it to print. His death was not sudden, and he will have ensured that his notes were sufficient for the book to be finished. His wife was his editor, and I am sure she will want to see the series completed in his memory. Certainly it wouldn’t be the first epic series to continue after the death of its author, the most notable example that comes to mind being Dune.
Hopefully the panic from fans will be minor…
Envelope Filter 
Recent Comments